Alzheimer's Disease

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized as a progressive and irreversible brain disease resulting in the eventual impairment of all cognitive functioning for the affected individual[1]. Despite all current efforts in determining a definite cause for AD, there are three prevailing hypotheses which have been proposed. These involve the oxidative stress, β- amyloid fibril and tau protein hypotheses; all of which are interrelated and are potential mechanisms for the underlying medical condition.
Diagnosis of AD is done with mental-state examinations coupled with functional or structural scans[2]. The combination of tests helps in ruling out other potential mental illnesses that produce similar symptoms. Identification of biomarkers (eg. Tau, β-amyloid[2]) provides a step forward in determining the cause of AD as well as potential therapies that could be used to target the specific biomarkers.
Alzheimer’s disease is known to be correlated with traumatic brain injuries (TBI), as suffering from even one event of TBI has been shown to increase neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid-β plaques[3]. TBI has been shown to up-regulate the enzyme BACE1, which increases amyloid-beta plaques[4]. It also up-regulates apolipoproteins, and possessing a particular allele called apolipoprotein E4 has been correlated with increased susceptibility to developing AD[5].
The current literature regarding the prevention of AD is focused on several avenues of research. The most well researched preventative measures are angiotensin II receptor blockers, vitamin D and omega 3 fatty acids[6]. These 3 mainly target the formation of amyloid plaques and the prevention of oxidative stress on neurons.
Currently there are no methods available for curing AD, but there are a variety of pharmaceutical and psychosocial treatments that can be utilized by patients. There are many on-going experiments and research using alternative methods such as intranasal insulin and methylene blue which have shown great potential in developing a cure.

Bibliography
1. Alzheimer’s Disease. (2011). Alzheimer’s Disease Education and Referral Center. Publication No. 11-6423.
2. Schapiro R.C., Fagan A.M., Holtzman D.M. (2009). Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 35: 128-140.
3. Johnson, V.E., Stewart W, Smith, D.H. (2012). Widespread τ and amyloid-β pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans. Brain Pathol, 22(2): 142-149
4. Walker KR, Kang EL, Whalen MJ, Shen Y, Tesco G. (2012). Depletion of GGA1 and GGA3 mediates post-injury elevation of BACE1. The Journal of Neuroscience. 32(30): 10423-10437
5. Zhou W, Xu D, Peng X, Zhang O, Jia J, Crutcher K.A. (2008). Meta-analysis of APOE4 allele and outcome after traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 25(4): 279-290
6. Vitiello, G., Di Marino, S., D’Ursi, A.M., D’Errico, G. (2013). Omega 3 fatty acids regulate the interaction of the Alzheimer’s Aβ(25-35) peptide with lipid membranes. Langmuir. 29(46): 14239-14245


1.0 Molecular Mechanisms of Pathology: Possible Hypotheses

main article: 1.0 Molecular Mechanisms of Pathology: Possible Hypotheses
author: Joanna Salvatore

Alzheimer's disease
Image Unavailable
Image courtesy of ZME Science
http://www.zmescience.com/medicine/diseases-medicine/earliest-signs-of-alzheimer-043243/

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is of major concern for the aging population due to its age-dependent onset, and progressive cognitive deterioration of the affected individual[1]. It is known that AD is the primary cause of dementia in the elderly, as well as a leading cause of disability and death[2]. AD is also associated with the significant loss of neurons, and cerebral and hippocampal atrophy[3]. Although the actual process of how the disease begins to arise is not for certain, its development has been suggested to be caused by a succession of events occurring over prolonged periods of time within the brain[1]. Distinct brain lesions further characterize AD, involving neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), and extracellular plaque formation[4]. The prevailing hypotheses that have been proposed to account for the changes occurring within the brain in AD encompass: oxidative stress, β- amyloid fibril and tau protein hypotheses. These postulations are all interrelated and serve as potential mechanisms for the underlying medical condition.

Bibliography
1. Alzheimer’s Disease. (2011). Alzheimer’s disease Education and Referral Center. Publication No. 11-6423.
2. Zhao, B., Zhao, Y. (2013). Oxidative Stress and the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2013: Article ID: 316523.
3. Abuznait, A., Kaddoumi, A. (2012). Role of ABC Transporters in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s Disease. Am Chem S. 3: 820-831.
4. Harman, D. (2006). Alzheimer’s Disease Pathogenesis: Role of Aging. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1067: 454-460.


2.0 Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease

main article: 2.0 Diagnostics of Alzheimer's Disease
author: Broencephalon

PET Scan of the brain: Healthy vs. AD
Image Unavailable
Image courtesy of the National Institute on Aging/National Institutes of Health

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia and is a neurodegenerative disease that is most prominent in aged-individuals[1]. Currently, the diagnosis of AD is difficult and comes with a degree of uncertainty. Its diagnosis is difficult because there is no single test that will prove beyond reasonable doubt that an individual has the disease. Similarly, its diagnosis comes with a degree of uncertainty because being the most common form of dementia, it shares many of the common symptoms (e.g. cognitive impairments, brain activity[2]). Tests to determine cognitive function used together in conjunction with modern brain scans and identification of potential biomarkers (e.g. β amyloid and Tau[2-3]) provide physicians with information that is required to generate a reliable diagnosis of AD. The only way to conclusively diagnose AD is to perform a brain biopsy; a clinical diagnosis is done by process of elimination[4] and will contain some degree of uncertainty as previously mentioned.

Bibliography
1. Rice R.A., Berchtold N.C., Cotman C.W., Green K.N. (2014). Age-related downregulation of the CaV3.1 T-type calcium channel as a mediator of amyloid beta production. Neurobiology of Aging. 35: 1002-1011.
2. Dubois B., Feldman H.H., Jacova C., DeKosky S.T., Gateau P.B., Cummings J., Delacourte A., Galasko D., Gauthier S., Jicha G., Meguro K., O’brien J., Pasquier F., Robert P., Rossor M., Salloway S., Stern Y., Visser P.J., Scheltens P. (2007). Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurology. 6: 734-746
3. Schapiro R.C., Fagan A.M., Holtzman D.M. (2009). Biomarkers of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 35: 128-140.
4. Mangino M., Middlemiss C. (1997). Alzheimer’s Disease: Preventing and Recognizing a Misdiagnosis. The Nurse Practioner. 22: 58-75.


3.0 Preventing Alzheimer's Disease

main article: 3.0 Preventing Alzheimer's Disease
author: Darren Tan

Alzheimer's Disease
Image Unavailable
Courtesy of www.Webicina.com

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the only one of the top 10 causes of death in the United States for which concrete strategies of prevention have not been found.[1] By 2050, there are estimated to be 13 million dementia patients in the United States alone.[2] As the most common form of Dementia, it is imperative that possible methods of prevention be found in order to combat this neurodegenerative disease. Several substances have been found to reduce the risk of AD, including Angiotensin II receptor blockers, Vitamin D, and Omega 3 fatty acids. With further research and perhaps application of a combination of these factors, it may be possible to prevent or dramatically reduce the risk of AD.

Bibliography
1. Currais, A. et al. (2013). Modulation of p25 and inflammatory pathways by fisetin maintains cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease transgenic mice. Aging Cell. pp 1- 12.
2. Qiu, W.Q., et al. (2013). Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the reduced risk of Alzheimer's disease in the absence of Apoliprotein E4 allele. Journal of Alzheimer's disease, 37, 421-428.


4.0 Alzheimer's Disease and Traumatic Brain Injury

main article: 4.0 Alzheimer's Disease and Traumatic Brain Injury
author: Karthik Natarajan

Alzheimer's disease and TBI
Image Unavailable
TBI is known to have significant correlation with
development of Alzheimer's. Image adapted from
[4]

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is influenced by both genetics and the environment [1]. There has been a significant correlation identified between suffering a traumatic brain injury (TBI) and developing Alzheimer’s disease so TBI is an important environmental factor that can influence development of the disease[2]. TBI is very prevalent in society – each year, 1.7 million people in the United States suffer a head injury[2]. TBI has been shown to cause very similar neurological changes to those observed in Alzheimer’s patients, such as increased neurofibrillary tangles (NFT’s) and amyloid-β plaques which eventually result in neuronal death, through oxidative stress triggering apoptotic cell pathways, and impaired transport and function of mitochondria [2][3].

TBI has been shown to elevate the levels of Aβ producing proteins, thereby increasing Aβ levels. It causes functional changes at the level of the synapse which result in synaptic degeneration. TBI also elevates the levels of proteins involved in Aβ degrading mechanisms, such as neprilysin and apolipoprotein E. However, genetic polymorphisms have been identified in Aβ degrading proteins, which reduce their ability to degrade Aβ. Therefore, formation of long-lasting Aβ plaques following TBI is ultimately dependent on whether or not an individual possesses polymorphisms in Aβ degrading proteins.

Bibliography
1. Walker, K.R., Kang, E.L., Whalen, M.J., Shen, Y., & Tesco G. (2012). Depletion of GGA1 and GGA3 mediates post-injury elevation of BACE1. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(30), 10423-10437.
2. Johnson, V.E., Stewart, W., & Smith, D.H. (2012). Widespread τ and amyloid-β pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans. Brain Pathol, 22(2), 142-149
3. Walker, K.R., & Tesco, G. (2013). Molecular mechanisms of cognitive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, 29
4. 2012 September 14. Neuroscience club hosts discussion of traumatic brain injury on Sep 24. [Image]. Retrived March 29, 2014 from http://blogs.brandeis.edu/science/2012/09/14/traumatic-brain-injury/


5.0 Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease

main article: 5.0 Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
author: Mingzhe Liu

Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease
Image Unavailable
Courtesy of: www.cnn.com

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is often characterized as both a progressive and irreversible brain disease which has been linked to the eventual loss of all cognitive function [1]. Although AD has been widely studied throughout; at present, there are no methods in which to fully cure AD due to not knowing the underlying cause of the condition. Instead, current methods in treatment aim to alleviate some symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease relying on a variety of pharmaceutical and psychosocial treatments that can be administered to the patient. The 2 main groups of drugs in use are acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonist, which help to regulate the amount of acetylcholine and glutamine present- allowing for better cognitive functioning [2-3]. As well, it has been shown that psychosocial treatments prescribed in conjunction with pharmaceutical treatments have had great results for patients with AD [4]. Many on-going experiments have also shown great potential in offering a cure, such as Deep Brain Stimulation and Methylene Blue. As with the introduction and development of Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery technology, this has also opened up many new opportunities for the development and incorporation of other treatment methods, such as targeted drug and stem cell delivery to the specific regions of the brain affected by AD.

Bibliography
1. Alzheimer’s Disease. (2011). Alzheimer’s Disease Education and Referral Center. Publication No. 11-6423.
2. Pohanka, M (2011). Cholinesterases, a target of pharmacology and toxicology. Biomedical Papers Olomouc 155 (3): 219–229.
3. Lipton SA (2006). Paradigm shift in neuroprotection by NMDA receptor blockade: memantine and beyond. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 5 (2): 160–170.
4. Bottino CM, Carvalho IA, Alvarez AM et al. (2005). Cognitive rehabilitation combined with drug treatment in Alzheimer's disease patients: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil 19 (8): 861–869.



Add a New Comment
_a
Unless otherwise stated, the content of this page is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License